<br />
<b>Deprecated</b>:  Function create_function() is deprecated in <b>/home/hidefide/public_html/blog/wp-content/plugins/wr-pagebuilder/core/core.php</b> on line <b>127</b><br />
{"id":201,"date":"2016-09-06T12:58:13","date_gmt":"2016-09-06T12:58:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/icaruspressblog.wordpress.com\/?p=201"},"modified":"2019-04-17T12:17:37","modified_gmt":"2019-04-17T12:17:37","slug":"spamfoolery-sucks-to-be-you-edition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hidefideas.com\/blog\/2016\/09\/06\/spamfoolery-sucks-to-be-you-edition\/","title":{"rendered":"Spamfoolery: Sucks to be You Edition"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" size-full wp-image-203 alignleft\" src=\"http:\/\/hidefideas.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/mug_spam2.jpg\" alt=\"mug_spam2\" width=\"156\" height=\"150\">In an increasingly litigious world, it\u2019s easy to tune out when you hear that one company is getting sued by yet another company for infringements real or imagined. But in this edition of Spamfoolery, you\u2019ll want to stay tuned to hear how much e360 Insight was awarded in the culmination of its long-running feud with the Spamhaus Project.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>At very least, the endless litany of lawsuits in the tech world provide great fodder for blog writers. Even better, they also offer up a hearty chuckle once in a while, and the recent verdict in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.circleid.com\/posts\/20110902_seventh_circuit_awards_e360_whopping_3_in_damages_against_spamhaus\/\">long-running suit<\/a> of e360 Insight LLC. v. the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.spamhaus.org\/\">Spamhaus Project<\/a> is no exception.<\/p>\n<p>First, a little background to whet your appetite: in case you weren\u2019t already familiar with it, the Spamhaus Project is a not-for-profit organization based in the U.K. and founded in 1998 by Steve Linford for the sole purpose of identifying and tracking spammers. All in all, pretty good stuff, since most spammers suck. I say \u2018most\u2019 because I still contend that the world needs some spammers \u2013 in much the same way I hate spiders, yet I acknowledge the need for spiders to keep other nasty vermin from spreading the way the Spanish Flu did in 1918.<\/p>\n<h2><strong>Tune in for Another Episode of \u201cAs the Spam Turns\u2026\u201d<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>e360 Insights, LLC, on the other hand, is the alleged vermin in this soap opera. Way back in 2006, American Dave Linhardt, operating under the umbrella of e360, filed suit against Spamhaus for blacklisting his emailings and effectively labelling Mr. Linhardt a \u2013 you guessed it \u2013 spammer. Initially, the suit was tried in U.S. Federal District Court in Illinois, but the American law firm hired by Spamhaus petitioned the court to relocate the trial to the U.K., arguing that Spamhaus did not fall under U.S. jurisdiction. It gets more interesting from here on in, because the judge at the time ignored the request and British M.P. Derek Wyatt called for the American judge to be suspended from his post. Spamhaus also pulled out of the trial, prompting the judge to award e360 $11.7 million in damages.<\/p>\n<p>Spamhaus refused to accept the judgement, stating that the court\u2019s ruling had, \u201cno validity in the U.K. and cannot be enforced under the British legal system.\u201d Following the ruling, e360 filed suit to force <a href=\"http:\/\/www.icann.org\/\">ICANN<\/a> to remove Spamhaus\u2019 domain records until the matter was settled, inciting another interesting development. ICANN, a U.S. based entity with international responsibility for domain names, refused, stating they didn\u2019t have the authority to cancel a British website\u2019s domain records. In this matter, the same judge who awarded e360 the big chunk of cash sided with ICANN and Spamhaus, and poor little e360 found itself facing new problems.<\/p>\n<h2><strong>It Gets Better\u2026<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>In 2007, Chicago law firm Jenner &amp; Block took Spamhaus\u2019 case pro-bono and had the original damages overturned, thus sending the case back to district court. In early 2008, e360 filed for bankruptcy and terminated operations, citing its excessive legal costs in the matter of e360 v. Spamhaus.<\/p>\n<h2><strong>Wait for it\u2026<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>In 2010, another court reduced the damages from <strong>$11.7 million<\/strong> to <strong>$27,000<\/strong>, all this in the face of e360 filing for <strong>$135,173,577<\/strong> <strong>(<\/strong>adjusted to<strong> $122,271,346 <\/strong>a week before trial) in damages! Keeping in mind that, \u201cthe district court cited\u2026Linhardt&#8217;s testimony regarding contracts with three customers who collectively paid e360 $27,000 per month for services performed,\u201d it\u2019s no surprise that the new judge in the case blasted e360\u2019s counsel, stating, \u201cthis is just totally irresponsible litigation&#8230;You can&#8217;t just come into a court with a fly-by-night, nothing company and say &#8216;I&#8217;ve lost $130 million.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n<h2><strong>Wins Enough to Buy a Coffee!<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>Now for the really good part. On September 2, 2011, the soap opera finally came to an end, with the judge in the matter awarding e360 <strong>$3 in damages<\/strong>. No, that wasn\u2019t a typo. From an asked $130 million to an award of $11.7 million, to $27,000, to (almost) enough to buy a coffee at Starbucks!<\/p>\n<h2><strong>Who Said There\u2019s no Justice for Spammers?<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>It sucks to be you, e360! It\u2019s fun writing these articles, and I often find myself giggling like a schoolgirl when I write them. The case of e360 v. Spamhaus has been no exception, except that the ear-to-ear grin on my face has been accompanied by outright laughter as I sit alone by the pool, typing like a banshee. A strange sight, to be sure, and if any of the neighbors are watching, they must think me mad.<\/p>\n<p>Maybe I am, but today I\u2019m very happy.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In an increasingly litigious world, it\u2019s easy to tune out when you hear that one company is getting sued by yet another company for infringements&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":203,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":true,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20,13,14],"tags":[11,9,10,8,7],"class_list":["post-201","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-humor","category-security","category-spam","tag-allspammedup","tag-bot","tag-botnet","tag-malware","tag-spam","jsn-master"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hidefideas.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hidefideas.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hidefideas.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hidefideas.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hidefideas.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=201"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/hidefideas.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1842,"href":"https:\/\/hidefideas.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201\/revisions\/1842"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hidefideas.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/203"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hidefideas.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=201"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hidefideas.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=201"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hidefideas.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=201"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}